Showing posts with label Alane Ferguson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alane Ferguson. Show all posts

Nov 13, 2011

Alane Ferguson - Author Interview: Internationally Bestselling Novelist

What kinds of fiction did you read as a child and teenager, and did you have some favourites?

I must confess I had my nose in a book constantly as a child and teenager, although as a teen I skipped right on to adult literature to Jane Austen and the Bronte sisters. (I refer to this as my English tea period…) When young, my favorites included Charlotte’s Web by E. B. White and Willie Wonka and the Chocolate Factory by Roald Dahl, although to this day I blame that book for my ever-present sweet tooth! Later, I fell in love with Rhett Butler in Margaret Mitchell’s Gone With the Wind, which I read at least forty times late at night while hidden beneath my covers, a flashlight tucked firmly beneath my chin. And oh, how I loved the tragic story of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, which made me weep without fail. Still, my all time favorite novel was and is To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee. Her writing is nothing short of transcendent.

Would you say your childhood and teenage reading has had a distinct influence on how you write fiction now, and why?

My early reading influenced me deeply because through novels I learned to accept imagined worlds. I believed in them as sincerely as I believed in planet Earth. At least once a week, my sister Jan (the second daughter in our family) would read to me from Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings, and those times were simply magical. Books became personal teleports to different times and kingdoms. This has translated to me in my own writing, because with the page as my canvas, I know I can ‘paint’ whatever I imagine!

What did you do before you became a published novelist, and how did you come to write your first novel and get it published?

I was a fulltime wife and mother, and it was a both a surprise and thrilled to find my voice as a writer. Unfortunately, this answer will be a reiteration because I addressed this under the STORY and CHARACTER section, but I will repeat it here in case readers are choosing to access the author by category only. Again, I must go back to my origins in order to fully explain how I became a published author. The truth is always stranger than fiction!

When I was young, my sisters and I called ourselves the Estrogen Nation, because I was the fourth in a family of five daughters all born within six years to an aerospace engineer father and an author mother. All of my sisters went on to amazing careers (doctor, engineers, etc.) but I, sadly, never finished college. I actually learned to write in an unconventional way, which I can only describe as ‘author osmosis.’ I began to understand the intricacies of writing by critiquing my mother’s published work (I had that kind of chutzpah at the tender age of twelve, if you can believe it. To her credit, my mother actually listened to my ideas. I’m not saying she took all of my advice, but she considered my opinion, which, in retrospect, is amazing. Here’s a shout out to my still-publishing mother, author Gloria Skurzynski – she rocks!).

I also had the privilege to eavesdrop on the writers’ group held in our house. (Important writing tip: choose your parents wisely!) My mother’s published friends read aloud, and that was followed by a gentle but straightforward manuscript critiquing. Character arcs and plotlines were discussed, work was polished, and I learned the most valuable lesson about writing anyone could learn, which is to embrace the revision process. As to creating my own world, well, for me it was a bit like learning to play an instrument by ear – I’d absorbed all kinds of information, so one day I just jumped into the deep end of the pool and wrote a picture book. Luckily for me, it was sold to the first publisher I sent it to. That unexpected success was followed by an Edgar Alan Poe Award for my first novel, Show Me The Evidence, and…I’ve been writing ever since. I’ve been very, very fortunate!

How would you describe your style of fiction or your approach to writing fiction during your first few novels?

I think it’s safe to say I was more or less writing blind and my style was whatever popped out of my head onto the page. Because I’d seen my mother succeed in publishing her books, I approached writing with a naive optimism that seems almost laughable. My sister Jan always told me it’s better to be lucky than good. Looking back, I realize just how fortunate I was!

Was your first published novel standalone or part of a series, and what advantages or disadvantages did this present for you?

My first novel was a standalone. It was an advantage because I didn’t face the challenge of reintroducing the characters to my readers, although the disadvantage was that there was much less characterization of my protagonist than has been revealed about Cameryn through my Forensic Mystery Series. Plusses and minuses whichever way I go!

Did you find writing your second novel easier or more challenging than writing your first novel and why?

Can I cheat a bit here and answer ‘both’ to this question? In some ways it was much easier writing the second novel in The Forensic Mystery Series, because the characters had already been established and I knew where I was going with Cameryn’s character arc. It was less demanding because I knew her better. On the other hand, it is a huge challenge to make a sequel read as a standalone. What that means is I have to reintroduce the characters to my reader in each novel (and their back stories) without all that recycled information catching the reader’s eye – sort of like an author optical illusion. That can really give me a headache. At this point I’m writing the sixth book in that series, which means I have to reestablish Lyric with fans who already know her while being aware that it might be the first installment a new reader picks up. As an example, just yesterday I received an email from a fan who told me she’d just read The Circle of Blood (book three) and wanted to know if there were any more in the series. She had read the novel unaware of The Christopher Killer (book one) and The Angel of Death (book two), which would have made The Circle of Blood a richer experience. Yet the storyline still made sense to her even though the book itself was read out of order. It’s a very fine line to write!

One last thought that tips the scales to ‘easier’ in this equation. I’ve always likened writing to any physical activity that requires practice – the more you do it, the easier it becomes. I believe writing develops a kind of ‘muscle memory’ in the brain. Which is to say that way back when, novel number two was definitely less difficult for me to write than Show Me the Evidence. So to all aspiring writers, remember to work out those creative muscles every day!

Who is another novelist whose fiction writing you admire and why?

My favorite novelist is Jeffrey Eugenides, whom I consider the best producing author in the world. (I’m pining for Harper Lee to unveil a heretofore hidden treasure trove of novels, but after fifty years of silence my hope is beginning to falter.) Eugenides’ novel Middlesex is his masterpiece. In it, he uses a point of view that is uniquely his own (omniscient first person?) and makes me care deeply about every character stitched into his literary tapestry. His graceful turn of a phrase is unparalleled. I am in awe of him!

Pick a series of novels you have written. How would you describe what makes that a cohesive series with strong appeal for readers?

The Forensic Mystery Series has forced me to deal with the tricky element of creating cohesion between five (soon to be six) novels. When I set out to write this series, retaining some kind of continuity between the books was forefront in my mind; I knew I had to have a firm vision before I launched into such a big undertaking, especially since my original contract with Penguin called for four installments, which means a lot of material. Initially, my idea centered on the dark underworld of autopsies, and I used those forensic threads as a way to achieve a literary cohesion. In actuality, hardcore forensics is the ‘signature’ of my mysteries. Cameryn relies on her intellect as well as her powers of observation when she studies the ultimate crime scene - the naked, human body exposed in all its vulnerability. (A cadaver is the final witness to the person’s final moments, and it always has secrets to tell.)

However, once I nailed down my ‘hook’ I quickly realized that unity could not be achieved by forensics alone. Stories are ultimately about people. For Cameryn, that means bringing love into her otherwise sterile, controlled forensic world. Enter uber-hot deputy Justin Crowley! The tension between them heats up through all the books, and the supporting cast of characters was written to build emotional scaffolding for my readers. Throughout the series I have delved into Cameryn’s personal struggles as she tries to balance her status as a forensic prodigy against the yearnings of her very human, teenage heart. So whether my reader is Turkish or German, I hope they can identify with Cameryn as an evolving character whom they want to follow on her amazing, if somewhat gruesome, journey!

How would you summarise one of your novels in one paragraph?

I just had a brainwave and decided it might be a twist to reprint the publisher’s copy from the back of The Dying Breath paperback. Okay, okay, I know it’s an easy out, but Penguin did a nice job summarizing the perils Cameryn faces in the fourth installment of my mystery series. So here’s what they wrote: Once Cameryn thought she loved Kyle O’Neil. And she thought he loved her. But that was before he tried to kill her. Now he’s after her again, sending her e-mails, leaving her notes. And making it clear that he knows exactly where she is and where she’s going to be. Cameryn’s got to find a way to stop him – before he hurts her, or someone else…

Yes, I admit I’m being oh-so-sneaky by using their words instead of my own, but it’s more fun for me to read someone else’s take on my work. Kudos to Penguin!

How would you describe the appeal of this novel to readers?

I hope it reads as CSI meets Twilight – lots of forensics dipped into a batter of romance and then deep-fried in bubbling hot suspense. Wait, that last sentence was telling. When I resort to food images it means I’ve been sitting at my desk for far too a long and I’m getting hungry. Two more questions and I promise I’ll take a break and eat something healthy.

How would you summarise a chapter from this novel in one paragraph?

I’m back to being serious (it always amazes people to find that although I write dark material, I am actually quite lighthearted) so for this question I’ll turn to the first chapter of The Dying Breath. Every first chapter is the foundation stone of the novel; as in real buildings, if you get in wrong, the structure will be off kilter until to the end.

Cameryn, no longer content to have her life bubble-wrapped by her loving but overprotective town, makes a daring move when she breaks into a possible crime scene on an icy cold, Colorado day. What she discovers inside the dilapidated house is more terrifying than anything she could have imagined. The danger, she realizes, does not lie without, but within. And Cameryn is the target of a threat that could jeopardize them all.

How would you describe the contribution this chapter makes to the novel?

This chapter introduces Cameryn to the new readers while bringing her up to speed with established fans. She is thrust into immediate danger that lurks somewhere just beyond her view. I believe this chapter is the key to grabbing my readers and never letting go.

Author Website: www.alaneferguson.com

Kobo ebooks Visit Powells.com

Nov 10, 2011

Alane Ferguson - Author Interview: Narrative Style

Which narrative point of view (first person, second person or third person) do you use most in your fiction, or do you often use different points of view for different stories, and why?

Most of my writing has been done in third person because I’ve felt that it has given me more room to breathe as an artist. Third person allows an omniscient flavor when it comes to what my characters see and feel in my created world. So it was an unexpected change when I began writing Dragonfly Eyes, switching from my comfortable third person to first person present, but that’s the way the story seemed to insist it be written. It’s been a challenge to retrain this new kind of ‘writing ear’ as I create from a totally different vantage point. To me, the benefit has been that Dragonfly Eyes reads on a more personal level – I’m literally seeing what Savannah sees and experiencing her pain as she tries to make sense of her new world. It would have been easier to stay in my writing sweet spot, but as an author, I’ve always felt that it’s good to push at my own walls. Viewing the world through Savannah’s eyes and reporting everything she experiences has been an amazing exercise, although I have to admit I’ve felt myself slipping back into third person on more than one occasion. Still, I’ve persisted in this new (for me) sound. The result has been a refreshing kind of intimacy in Dragonfly Eyes!

Do you use present tense or past tense most in your fiction, or do you often switch tense for different stories, and why?

I have most often written in the past tense, although the Dragonfly Eyes trilogy is set in the present. I switched to present tense to flex my writing muscles and to create a different kind of personal space for my character. It seems to be working!

Pick one of your published stories. What combination of point of view and tense did you use for this story, and why?

In The Christopher Killer I chose to use third person past tense with Cameryn Mahoney as my protagonist. I used Cameryn’s vantage point, but I felt third person allowed me to use a broader writing stroke.

To what extent is the vocabulary and manner of speech of the narration in this story different from your own everyday expression, and what does this contribute to the story?

I’ve been lucky in that Cameryn is an academic personality who loves to share unusual facts, such as the prime ingredient in dandruff shampoo or the delicacy required when creating a forensic ‘brain bucket.’ (My friends sometimes call me as Hermione, as in Hermione Granger from Harry Potter. Aren’t they hilarious?) The upshot is that Cameryn’s intonation is fairly close to my own. We both find people fascinating and we both know how to laugh, which means writing Cameryn’s speech is easy since she is more or less an extension of myself.
Savannah, on the other hand, is a character that ‘had it all’ before she was brutally murdered, so she is a departure from my real, more modest life. The protagonist I created begins her journey as a person with a deep sense of entitlement. Her character arc occurs mostly on the ‘other side.’ That means in the beginning of my book, Savannah’s ‘voice’ is very different from how I, the author, speak, so researching the voice patterns of that kind of girl became a fascinating journey. Fortunately, I present workshops to high schools around the country, which has brought me into contact with heretofore-unreachable echelons. I’ve observed the various social hierarchies among young women and have taken copious mental notes. Like an anthropologist in the wild, I’ve studied the way the affluent express themselves in both their speech and in their writing. I must admit to listening intently when these beautiful creatures whisper secrets about their lives. Access has allowed me to absorb their mannerisms and their cadences, all of which is translated into Savannah’s ‘voice.’ We authors have a bit of the voyeur that allows us to create dialogue apart from the self that rings through our own heads. It’s a joy to wear a new, metaphorical skin!

Did you tell this story with one narrator or multiple narrators, and why?

Every story I have ever written has been told by a single narrator (my protagonist) because I believe it gives my reader deeper access into how characters like Cameryn or Savannah see their world. To me, being hemmed into one point of view is somewhat limiting, but I guess that’s why it works: we all experience our lives through our own limited personal lenses, and the results are decidedly mixed. So many problems stem from assumptions we as individuals bring into our interaction with others – and everyone believes they are right! Miscommunication is one way to ratchet up the tension in a manuscript. While I enjoy the omniscience of multiple narrators in other authors’ work, I have stayed with the point of view that works for my style of writing, which is one narrator and a single point of view.

Did you make the narrator of this story a character involved in the main action of the story, or did you make the narrator one which is not a character in your fictional story world, and why?

Because it is told from a third person limited point of view, the narrator of The Christopher Killer is not a character in the story. In Dragonfly Eyes, the narrator is Savannah Anderson, who is the protagonist. I did this to achieve different flavors in my writing.

What is one of your favourite fictional stories, in which you think the narration is written well, and how would you describe what makes the narration work so well for you as a reader?

Once again, I’ll turn to the story “Dragonfly Eyes” in the anthology Fear. This is my favorite part of the story (spoiler alert!) which also happens to be its end: The police are running inside the building, and I know they are just moments away. When I look ahead I see there will be a huge funeral inside the gym for me, with thousands of flowers emanating their oversweet scent. Everyone will weep and secretly wonder if Claire should have been taken instead of me. The thought makes me sad. Because like a dragonfly, I perceive with a panoramic vision that reveals truth. Neither one of us should have been taken in that in that wasteful act of violence, but it is Claire, not me, who is destined to accomplish amazing things. The girl I ignored will leave her mark on the world in a way I never could. To know this helps me accept my fate. The understanding is bittersweet, a lesson learned too late on earth, and yet I see a new purpose in my lingering here. From this side I believe the right girl lived.
And I’ll be watching her, every day, until we meet again.
It is my hope that this narration brings out emotion in the reader, because when I initially wrote that last sentence I actually cried. I’d like to believe Savannah is still nearby, happy that I am writing a part of her story for others to share. It is my way of giving her immortality.

Do you usually provide direct access to the thoughts of characters in your stories? If so, do you usually provide access to the thoughts of one character or multiple characters in a single story or point of view, and why?

I do provide access to the thoughts of my protagonist, but my protagonist only. This is done purposefully, because many problems are caused by misunderstandings between people and I want my characters to be just as limited as the rest of us. Communication is a challenge for us all!


To what extent does the narrative type of novels you read have an impact on why you read them, and why?

The style of narration is not a factor on whether or not I choose to read a novel – it’s the characters and conflict I’m after! Variations of style are just the cherry atop the reading ice cream!

Author Website: www.alaneferguson.com


Kobo ebooks Visit Powells.com

Nov 8, 2011

Alane Ferguson - Author Interview: Setting

Pick one of your favorites among the settings from your published fiction stories or a setting which is an interesting example from your published fiction. What makes this setting one of your favorites or an interesting example from your fiction?

The story of Dragonfly Eyes is set in Charleston, South Carolina, as it is one of my very favorite settings ever. I fell in love with the area while on a speaking trip, so much so that I vowed to create a place for it in my fiction. Dragonfly Eyes has been the perfect fit! America is a relatively new country, and my state, Colorado, is one of the later additions to the Union. Where I live, a building over one hundred years old is considered ancient. So when I walked down the candy-colored streets of Charleston, as I drank in the city’s almost four- hundred-year history along with its magnolia-tinged air, I knew this was the place for my character Savannah to live and to die. I’m sure it won’t come as a surprise that one of my favorite places was walking through Charleston’s oldest cemetery late at night. The worn headstones, the skull-and-crossbones etched on granite (indicating the occupant died of a contagious disease, warning potential grave robbers to stay away) and the spiked fences caught my imagination. But in addition to the ethereal graveyards, Charleston’s enchanting architecture made me feel as if I had wandered into a fairytale. Because my story is magical, I wanted a magical setting, and Charleston was note-perfect for Dragonfly Eyes.

What is a setting from a published fiction story by another author you would compare this setting to and why are they similar?

I read and loved The Secret Life of Bees by Sue Monk Kidd, which is also set in lush, mysterious South Carolina. However, although the setting is where the similarities begin, it is also where they end. One reason for this could be explained by the element of time. The Secret Life of Bees is set in 1964, while Dragonfly Eyes is set in the present. The decades significantly alter the landscape.

How would you describe the way you introduced this setting to readers of your story?

The expanded trilogy of Dragonfly Eyes begins with Savannah in her palatial Charleston home. While distant storm clouds darken the sky, Savannah gathers friends to help conduct a séance, which leads to a flash-in-the-mirror visit from a once loved, now dead boyfriend. The introduction is both sinister and romantic.

How would you describe the interaction of story and setting in this story?

The setting is crucial to Dragonfly Eyes because it furthers the mystical elements essential to my ghost story. I cannot imagine this novel set anywhere but South Carolina. Charleston itself has become a character in its own right. In these novels, the story and setting are bound to one another.

How much research did you do for the setting of this story and what did that involve?

The research for Dragonfly Eyes included two trips to South Carolina and a several late night visits to Charleston’s oldest cemeteries. I’ve researched the history and walked the walk – which was much more pleasant than my trips to the morgue for The Forensic Mystery Series!

To what extent would you describe the setting of this story typical or atypical of the setting in your fiction stories?

The setting of Dragonfly Eyes is completely atypical for me as an author, since I’ve lived in the American West almost all of my life and that’s where all my other stories have been set. ‘Write what you know’ is a creed I’ve lived by as well as advice I’ve taught to aspiring writers for over twenty years. Having said that, it was fun to stretch my wings and mix things up as far as location was concerned. To that end, I immersed myself in the south and just luxuriated in a change of scene. Jewel-colored flowers, enormous trees ensconced by hanging moss and the ocean undulating nearby was nothing short of paradise. It was a joy to place my story in Charleston!

How do you usually decide on or develop a setting for your fiction stories?

Again, up until this point, my settings normally reflect my own habitat, which for the past twelve years has been beautiful Colorado. It was a departure for me to go to the south for Dragonfly Eyes, but the choice was thought out because I wanted a more historic vibe for these novels, and Charleston fit the bill. The Civil War comes into play, which also suggested a location like Charleston. In my mind, the setting is my canvas. It is an advantage to know my palate by heart, and a wonderful challenge to learn a new one!

To what extent do the settings of novels you read have an impact on why you read them, and why?

As an author, I’m almost exclusively drawn to the characters of a novel rather than the setting, but switching my location in my own novels has made me more sensitive to the importance of setting when reading. My latest passion has been The Hunger Games trilogy by Suzanne Collins. Her Capital setting as well as her two different, exotic fighting Arenas, were critical to telling her stories. Her books transport me to another world.

Author Website: www.alaneferguson.com

Kobo ebooks Visit Powells.com

Nov 4, 2011

Alane Ferguson - Author Interview: Story

Pick one of your favorites among your published fiction stories or a story which is an interesting example of published fiction. What makes this story one of your favorites or an interesting example from your fiction?

My favorite story is Dragonfly Eyes, which, as I explained in my Characters interview, is being expanded into a trilogy of novels. I think as a story it’s an interesting example of my fiction because in it I ask the question of what constitutes a life well-lived, particularly if one doesn’t have time enough to live it. The title Dragonfly Eyes comes from an ‘Ask Marilyn’ column; a reader queried what animal had the best vision on the planet. Her answer was the rabbit, but she said the creature that had the best vision was the dragonfly because it had prismatic vision that allowed it to see virtually everywhere. I imagined an earthbound spirit might gain a similar perspective, so I incorporated the concept of that super-vision exemplified by the title Dragonfly Eyes. By the end of the story, Savannah sees into other people’s souls, particularly one courageous character named Claire. Life, Savannah discovers, wasn’t at all what it had seemed when she was contained in a human form. What was important only moments before her death suddenly became trivial in the afterlife. Perhaps all of us will be surprised when death’s veil is lifted!

What genre(s) do you consider this story primarily to be, or how would you describe this story?

I would classify Dragonfly Eyes as a paranormal mystery. Wow – did I just make up a new genre? Never mind, I just Googled it and that is already a genuine literary category. So ‘paranormal mystery’ it is!

What is a published fiction story by another author you would compare this story to and why are they similar?

The story that comes to mind is The Lovely Bones by Alice Sebold. Her story and my Dragonfly Eyes are similar because they are both told from a ghost’s perspective, but they are quite different in that Savannah does more than just observe from the ‘other side.’ Savannah makes choices that affect the living as well as the dead, although the rules concerning earthbound spirits prohibit their interaction with humans. By breaking through, Savannah alters fate. Naturally, there is a consequence for that breach. So although they are similar, I choose to concentrate more on how these stories are different.

To what extent would you describe your story discussed here as typical or atypical of your fiction stories?

Dragonfly Eyes deals with death. Need I say more? (In other words, it’s typical of my subject matter!)

To what extent did you use any pre-existing story formula, template, paradigm, plot design, archetype, or theory or principles of story/plot structure in planning, writing, editing or rewriting this story?

What an interesting question! I answered this in the Characters interview, but will repeat it here in case readers are choosing to access one category only. Again, I must go back to my origins in order to fully explain how I approach the process of creating a storyline. When I was young, my sisters and I called ourselves the Estrogen Nation, because I was the fourth in a family of five daughters all born within six years to an aerospace engineer father and an author mother. All of my sisters went on to amazing careers (doctor, engineers, etc.) but I, sadly, never finished college. I actually learned to write in an unconventional way, which I can only describe as ‘author osmosis.’ I began to understand the intricacies of writing by critiquing my mother’s published work. (I had that kind of chutzpah at the tender age of twelve, if you can believe it. To her credit, my mother actually listened to my ideas. I’m not saying she took all of my advice, but she considered my opinion, which, in retrospect, is amazing. Here’s a shout out to my still-publishing mother, author Gloria Skurzynski – she rocks!).

I also had the privilege to eavesdrop on the writer’s group held in our house. (Important writing tip: choose your parents wisely!) My mother’s published friends read aloud, and that was followed by a gentle but straightforward manuscript critiquing. Character arcs and plotlines were discussed, work was polished, and I learned the most valuable lesson about writing anyone could learn, which is to embrace the revision process. As to creating my own world, well, for me it was a bit like learning to play an instrument by ear – I’d absorbed all kinds of information, so one day I just jumped into the deep end of the pool and wrote a picture book. Luckily for me, it was sold to the first publisher I sent it to. That unexpected success was followed by and Edgar Alan Poe Award for my first novel, Show Me The Evidence, and…I’ve been writing ever since. Which is my long-winded way of saying I’ve never heard of templates, paradigms, theories or archetypes. Embarrassing! For me, it boils down to the instinct of writing a strong story with a character I believe in, and then being ready to cut/expand/rethink anything that did not properly translate to my audience.

How would you describe the first chapter, scene or section of this story in one paragraph?

Answer: The first scene in “Dragonfly Eyes” is both terrifying and haunting. I believe that after completing such a jarring, life-to-death transition, a person would be above all confused, which is how I chose to portray Savannah’s initial response when she discovers she is no longer alive.

What makes this chapter, scene or section an effective opening for this story?

I believe it is effective because it is unique. Also, the question of what comes next is what I refer to as ‘a universal.’ Even if a person has come to the conclusion that this life is all there is, they have thought about what happens at the end. For Savannah, the end is only the beginning…

Major stages, twists or turns does the story conflict take in this story before the conflict is resolved (or not resolved)?

The major twist for Savannah is the realization that she never saw people correctly while she was alive. Her new paranormal vision makes her fearful to walk into The Light, because in death she is acutely aware of her own human inadequacies. This revelation about herself culminates in her decision to remain an earthbound spirit. It will be resolved by the completion of the trilogy, but I can’t tell you how I’m going to do it or it would ruin the surprise. I’ve already outlined books two and three, and trust me when I say there will be a major twist at the end!

How would you summarise the major sub-plot or sub-plots in this story? If this story has no sub-pots, how would you describe the main sub-plot or sub-plots from one of your favourite published fiction stories by another author?

The sub-plot for the novel Dragonfly Eyes concerns Savannah’s burgeoning feelings for Daniel, a young man she meets on the other side. Love while alive is complicated enough. When you’re dead, it’s close to impossible!

What does the story gain from the sub-plot or sub-plots?

The idea of consequences!

To what extent would you describe your story discussed here as typical or atypical of your fiction stories?

Again, I am turning the theme of death through my fingers like a worry stone. Which makes it typical of my fiction stories.

Author’s Website: www.alaneferguson.com

Kobo ebooks Visit Powells.com